Solve an exponential equation
(unknown in the power, or in the base)
- In 2 of 20 recent exams
- Paper 1 or 2
- 2 to 3 marks
How it is set in the exam
Paper 1 (no calculator) and Paper 2 (calculator), 2–3 marks, inside a functions question. Rare as a part of its own (2 of 20 exam versions: one Paper 1 (no calculator), one Paper 2 (calculator)), but it is the solving step inside many other questions: a model's rate constant or time, a stationary point of an exponential function, each root of a quadratic in ex (Where exponents and logs hide). On Paper 2 (calculator) the exact form is still found by hand.
Exam phrases to spot (4)
“find the exact value of x”
“give your answer in the form a+lnb”
“show that the value of a is …”
“solve f(x)=g(x)”
In disguise (4)
- f(x)=g(x) where g is a transformation of f: the same exponential is on both sides
- two exponentials and no constant term: they collect into one (a common factor that is never 0)
- a point with a fractional x-coordinate on the graph of y=ax: the unknown is the base
- the zero, or x-intercept, of one exponential and a constant, such as y=4−e2x: f(x)=0 is an equation to solve here (with no constant term, the intercept is Exponential and log graphs)
Variants (2)
- collect the exponential terms, then take ln: the exact answer a+lnb (, by hand)
- unknown base with a fractional exponent: anm=c, so raise both sides to mn (, "show that")
Looks like it, but isn't (5)
- two powers of ex and a constant, such as e2x−5ex+6=0: Quadratic in disguise
- a percentage per period with no formula in t, and a whole number of periods ("least n"): Find n: which term, how many terms, least n (a money question reaches it through the time row of Compound interest and depreciation, which sends the time unknown to Find n)
- a model in a context, such as a rate constant from a half-life, or the time to reach a value, even when a formula in continuous time asks for the first whole unit: Exponential and log models
- logs in the equation: Solve a logarithmic equation (the same numbers, the opposite first move:
- the y-intercept, asymptote or range of an exponential graph, and an x-intercept of an exponential expression with no constant term (factor out the lowest power of ex): Exponential and log graphs. The same equation, with no graph in the question, stays here.
The base from a point, then a common factor
Let f(x)=ax, where a>0. The graph of f passes through the point (−23,271).
(a) Show that a=9. [2]
(b) Solve f(x)=7×3x, giving your answer in the form lnqlnp, where p,q∈Z+. [3]
Try it yourself first, then compare.
Now try a question
Questions of this type are on their way. Try another one meanwhile: write your working on paper or on screen and see where each mark went. Free, with no account.
| The equation | Method |
|---|---|
| Unknown in the exponent: one exponential after collecting, or one on each side with different bases (2x+3=5x) | take ln (or log) of both sides; with two bases, bracket each exponent and collect the x terms (or divide first to get one power: 8×2x=5x gives (25)x=8) |
| Both sides are powers of one prime | common base, then equate the exponents (as in Exact value of a logarithm) |
| Several exponentials, no constant term | factor out, or divide by, the common exponential (it is never 0), then take ln |
| Two powers of ex and a constant | Quadratic in disguise |
| Unknown in the base: xnm=c | raise both sides to the power mn |
The same numbers, the unknown in different places: x23=8 has the unknown in the base, so x=832=4. (23)x=8 has it in the power, so x=ln1.5ln8=5.128…≈5.13.
- 1
Collect
the exponential terms. First write exponentials whose bases are powers of the same prime in one base: 9x=32x=(3x)2. With no constant term, factor out the common exponential or divide through by it: it is never 0. With one exponential on each side and different bases, leave them there and go to step 3.
- 2
Isolate one exponential equal to a constant
(or one on each side, as in step 1). If the constant is 0 or negative, there is no solution (ex>0 for every x).
- 3
Take ln
(or log) of both sides and solve the linear equation. With two different bases, bracket each exponent when the power law brings it down: ln2x+3=(x+3)ln2.
- 4
Give the exact form
asked for, a+lnb or a quotient of logs. On the decimal comes after the exact form.
- 5
Unknown in the base:
isolate the power, xnm=c with c>0 (the fraction in lowest terms), and raise both sides to the reciprocal power mn. If m is odd there is one root. If m is even, the negative number works too, because an even power hides the sign: x32=9 gives x=±27, but x23=27 gives only x=9. Keep the root the conditions allow (a base a>0 keeps 27).
- 6
Check
by substituting back; on , with a graph (zeros and intersections).
Taking ln of a sum term by term
ln(2ex−3+10) is not ln2+(x−3)+ln10. Collect the exponentials into one term first.
Cancelling an exponential without a reason
dividing by 3x or ex is allowed because it is never 0; say so. (Dividing by x is different: x can be 0, and dividing loses that root. Factorise instead, unless x=0 is already ruled out, as it is when the question says x>0.)
Solving ex=−2
there is no solution, because ex>0: say so. "x=ln(−2)" is not a solution; left in the answer, it loses the for rejecting it (Quadratic in disguise).
More mistakes (6)
Merging a number into a power
7×3x is not 21x, so ln(7×3x)=ln7+xln3.
A decimal where an exact form is asked for,
even on : 4.61 scores nothing for "a+lnb".
An exact form left unsimplified, or in the wrong form
x=0.5ln6 must be written 2ln6; a markscheme refused the unsimplified quotient as a final answer. And log37 is exact, but "the form lnqlnp" needs ln3ln7.
The wrong reciprocal power for an unknown base
a23=27 gives a=2732=9, not 2723.
An exponent left unbracketed
ln2x+3=(x+3)ln2, not x+3ln2.
Checking instead of showing
in "show that a=9", substituting 9 and getting 271 is a check, not a proof. Start from the point, a−23=271, and end on a=9 (the LHS-to-RHS layout).