Paper ZeroSign in

Solve a logarithmic equation

  • In 6 of 20 recent exams
  • Paper 1, no calculator
  • 2 to 5 marks
How it is set in the exam

Paper 1 (no calculator) only, 2–5 marks per part: a whole Section A question, or the zeros part of a Section B function question, often straight after a "show that". Common (6 of 20 exam versions, 8 parts, all Paper 1 (no calculator)). It is also the last step inside calculus and sequence questions (Where exponents and logs hide).

Spot it in the exam
Exam phrases to spot (6)
  • “solve log⁡b(…)−log⁡b(…)=c\log_b(\ldots) - \log_b(\ldots) = c”

  • “find the zeros of ff”

  • “find the xx-intercepts”

  • “solve the simultaneous equations”

  • “hence solve”

  • “show that”

In disguise (3)
  • the zeros of the log of a quadratic: the argument equals 11
  • "show that y=…y = \ldots", a relation between two unknowns from a log equation with a constant term: the first part of a simultaneous pair
  • two bases that are powers of the same number, such as log⁡2\log_2 and log⁡8\log_8
Variants (5)
  • a single log =0= 0: the xx-intercept of ln⁡\ln of a quadratic; the zeros of log⁡k\log_k of a quadratic, with surd answers
  • the difference of two logs in one base == a constant, after a factorise-and-cancel "show that"
  • log⁡A=log⁡B\log A = \log B with a rational power, after a "show that"
  • two bases that are powers of one number, one term with a coefficient
  • simultaneous log equations, one with the unknown as the base, with a relation shown first
Looks like it, but isn't (7)
  • a quadratic in ln⁡x\ln x (terms in (ln⁡x)2(\ln x)^2 and ln⁡x\ln x): Quadratic in disguise
  • the domain of the log of a quadratic (argument >0> 0): Quadratic inequalities; of the log of a linear expression: Exponential and log graphs
  • the greatest value of the log of a quadratic: Find the vertex
  • the unknown only in a power: Solve an exponential equation
  • the vertical asymptote of a log graph: Exponential and log graphs
  • an equation that comes from an integral with an unknown limit: Integrate: choose the method (its last steps are this type's)
  • a log-scale model solved for its input: Exponential and log models
Worked example

The zero of ln of a quadratic: surds, then the domain

Paper 1 (no calculator)
Question

Let f(x)=ln⁡(x2+2x−3)f(x) = \ln\left(x^2 + 2x - 3\right), for x>1x > 1. Find the coordinates of the point where the graph of ff meets the xx-axis. [4]

Try it yourself first, then compare.

Now try one like it

Write your working on paper or on screen. Paper Zero marks it step by step, like the worked example, and shows where each mark went. Free, with no account.

A handwritten page as Paper Zero marks it: ticks at the two lines that earned a mark, a cross on line 3 where +7 was copied as −7, and a short note beside that line.123456f′(x) = 4x − 124x − 12 = 0, so x = 3f(3) = 2(3)² − 12(3) − 7= 18 − 36 − 7 = −25minimum at (3, −25)M1 ✓A1 ✓A1 ✗11The +7 became −7: 18 − 36 + 7 = −11.
Which method?

After one base and one log on each side:

  • log⁡aX=c\log_a X = c
    Remove the logs by
    X=acX = a^c
    Example
    log⁡2(x+3)=5⇒x+3=32\log_2(x + 3) = 5 \Rightarrow x + 3 = 32
  • log⁡aX=log⁡aY\log_a X = \log_a Y
    Remove the logs by
    X=YX = Y
    Example
    ln⁡(2x)=ln⁡(x+4)⇒2x=x+4\ln(2x) = \ln(x + 4) \Rightarrow 2x = x + 4
  • log⁡xc=d\log_x c = d (unknown base)
    Remove the logs by
    xd=cx^d = c, a power equation (the unknown-base row of Solve an exponential equation)
    Example
    log⁡x32=52⇒x52=32\log_x 32 = \frac{5}{2} \Rightarrow x^{\frac{5}{2}} = 32, so x=4x = 4
  • terms in (ln⁡x)2(\ln x)^2
    Remove the logs by
    Quadratic in disguise
    Example
    (ln⁡x)2−3ln⁡x+2=0(\ln x)^2 - 3\ln x + 2 = 0

In every case, test the roots in the original arguments, and against any domain the question states.

Steps
  1. One base.

    Change of base where the bases differ: log⁡8x=13log⁡2x\log_8 x = \frac{1}{3}\log_2 x.

  2. One log on each side

    (or one log equal to a constant): power law first, then product and quotient. Write a constant as a log if that helps: 1=log⁡221 = \log_2 2.

  3. Remove the logs

    (table above).

  4. Solve

    the equation that is left: linear, quadratic, or a rational power.

  5. Two equations:

    remove the logs from each (a relation with no logs from the known base; a power equation from an unknown base), then substitute one into the other (Example 4.4).

  6. Test every root in every original argument

    (each must be >0> 0) and against any domain the question states (in Example 4.1 both roots make the argument 11, so only the domain can reject one); a base must also be positive and not 11. Reject the roots that fail, and say why. Use the equation as it was given: the laws can change which roots are allowed.

Common mistakes
  • Testing a root in a rewritten equation instead of the original.

    2ln⁡x=ln⁡92\ln x = \ln 9 has only x=3x = 3, because ln⁡(−3)\ln(-3) does not exist. But ln⁡(x2)=ln⁡9\ln\left(x^2\right) = \ln 9 has x=3x = 3 and x=−3x = -3, because (−3)2=9>0(-3)^2 = 9 > 0. After the power law the two equations look the same; their domains are not. (Compare k2=4k^2 = 4 in a binomial question, where both signs stay unless a condition removes one: Find an unknown (a constant or n) from given coefficients.)

  • Keeping a rejected root

    writing x=−1−5x = -1 - \sqrt{5} next to the right answer in Example 4.1 scores .

  • The xx-value alone when a point is asked

    "the point where the graph meets the xx-axis" needs (5−1,0)\left(\sqrt{5} - 1, 0\right). Markschemes have given for an xx-value on its own when a point was asked for; in Example 4.1, writing only x=5−1x = \sqrt{5} - 1 would be that mistake.

More mistakes (8)
  • Rejecting a root just because it is negative

    in Example 4.2, x=−4x = -4 is valid. What decides is the sign of each original argument and any domain the question states (in Example 4.1, x>1x > 1), never the sign of xx on its own.

  • Removing the logs term by term

    log⁡4X−log⁡4Y=1\log_4 X - \log_4 Y = 1 does not give X−Y=4X - Y = 4. Combine into one log first.

  • Losing the factor from a change of base

    log⁡8x=13log⁡2x\log_8 x = \frac{1}{3}\log_2 x, so 6log⁡8x=2log⁡2x6\log_8 x = 2\log_2 x, not 6log⁡2x6\log_2 x and not log⁡2x6\log_2 x^6. Then the power law comes before the quotient law: log⁡2(3x)−2log⁡2x=log⁡23xx2\log_2(3x) - 2\log_2 x = \log_2 \frac{3x}{x^2}, not log⁡23x2x\log_2 \frac{3x}{2x}.

  • Removing the logs with a constant still outside

    log⁡2y=log⁡2x2−3\log_2 y = \log_2 x^2 - 3 does not give y=x2−3y = x^2 - 3. Write 3=log⁡283 = \log_2 8 and combine first: y=x28y = \frac{x^2}{8} (Example 4.4).

  • Checking instead of showing

    in Example 4.4(a), substituting y=x28y = \frac{x^2}{8} back into log⁡2y=2log⁡2x−3\log_2 y = 2\log_2 x - 3 is a check, not a proof. Start from the given equation and end on x2=8yx^2 = 8y (the LHS-to-RHS layout).

  • Reading ln⁡X=0\ln X = 0 as X=0X = 0

    it means X=e0=1X = e^0 = 1.

  • The wrong base in the exponential form

    log⁡2X=3\log_2 X = 3 means X=23X = 2^3, not 323^2 and not e3e^3.

  • An unknown base of 11 or 00

    log⁡1\log_1 and log⁡0\log_0 don't exist, so such a root is rejected when the unknown is a base.

Next typeExact value of a logarithm