Solve a logarithmic equation
- In 6 of 20 recent exams
- Paper 1, no calculator
- 2 to 5 marks
How it is set in the exam
Paper 1 (no calculator) only, 2–5 marks per part: a whole Section A question, or the zeros part of a Section B function question, often straight after a "show that". Common (6 of 20 exam versions, 8 parts, all Paper 1 (no calculator)). It is also the last step inside calculus and sequence questions (Where exponents and logs hide).
Exam phrases to spot (6)
“solve logb(…)−logb(…)=c”
“find the zeros of f”
“find the x-intercepts”
“solve the simultaneous equations”
“hence solve”
“show that”
In disguise (3)
- the zeros of the log of a quadratic: the argument equals 1
- "show that y=…", a relation between two unknowns from a log equation with a constant term: the first part of a simultaneous pair
- two bases that are powers of the same number, such as log2 and log8
Variants (5)
- a single log =0: the x-intercept of ln of a quadratic; the zeros of logk of a quadratic, with surd answers
- the difference of two logs in one base = a constant, after a factorise-and-cancel "show that"
- logA=logB with a rational power, after a "show that"
- two bases that are powers of one number, one term with a coefficient
- simultaneous log equations, one with the unknown as the base, with a relation shown first
Looks like it, but isn't (7)
- a quadratic in lnx (terms in (lnx)2 and lnx): Quadratic in disguise
- the domain of the log of a quadratic (argument >0): Quadratic inequalities; of the log of a linear expression: Exponential and log graphs
- the greatest value of the log of a quadratic: Find the vertex
- the unknown only in a power: Solve an exponential equation
- the vertical asymptote of a log graph: Exponential and log graphs
- an equation that comes from an integral with an unknown limit: Integrate: choose the method (its last steps are this type's)
- a log-scale model solved for its input: Exponential and log models
The zero of ln of a quadratic: surds, then the domain
Let f(x)=ln(x2+2x−3), for x>1. Find the coordinates of the point where the graph of f meets the x-axis. [4]
Try it yourself first, then compare.
Now try one like it
Write your working on paper or on screen. Paper Zero marks it step by step, like the worked example, and shows where each mark went. Free, with no account.
After one base and one log on each side:
- logaX=c
- Remove the logs by
- X=ac
- Example
- log2(x+3)=5⇒x+3=32
- logaX=logaY
- Remove the logs by
- X=Y
- Example
- ln(2x)=ln(x+4)⇒2x=x+4
- logxc=d (unknown base)
- Remove the logs by
- xd=c, a power equation (the unknown-base row of Solve an exponential equation)
- Example
- logx32=25⇒x25=32, so x=4
- terms in (lnx)2
- Remove the logs by
- Quadratic in disguise
- Example
- (lnx)2−3lnx+2=0
| Form | Remove the logs by | Example |
|---|---|---|
| logaX=c | X=ac | log2(x+3)=5⇒x+3=32 |
| logaX=logaY | X=Y | ln(2x)=ln(x+4)⇒2x=x+4 |
| logxc=d (unknown base) | xd=c, a power equation (the unknown-base row of Solve an exponential equation) | logx32=25⇒x25=32, so x=4 |
| terms in (lnx)2 | Quadratic in disguise | (lnx)2−3lnx+2=0 |
In every case, test the roots in the original arguments, and against any domain the question states.
- 1
One base.
Change of base where the bases differ: log8x=31log2x.
- 2
One log on each side
(or one log equal to a constant): power law first, then product and quotient. Write a constant as a log if that helps: 1=log22.
- 3
Remove the logs
(table above).
- 4
Solve
the equation that is left: linear, quadratic, or a rational power.
- 5
Two equations:
remove the logs from each (a relation with no logs from the known base; a power equation from an unknown base), then substitute one into the other (Example 4.4).
- 6
Test every root in every original argument
(each must be >0) and against any domain the question states (in Example 4.1 both roots make the argument 1, so only the domain can reject one); a base must also be positive and not 1. Reject the roots that fail, and say why. Use the equation as it was given: the laws can change which roots are allowed.
Testing a root in a rewritten equation instead of the original.
2lnx=ln9 has only x=3, because ln(−3) does not exist. But ln(x2)=ln9 has x=3 and x=−3, because (−3)2=9>0. After the power law the two equations look the same; their domains are not. (Compare k2=4 in a binomial question, where both signs stay unless a condition removes one: Find an unknown (a constant or n) from given coefficients.)
Keeping a rejected root
writing x=−1−5 next to the right answer in Example 4.1 scores .
The x-value alone when a point is asked
"the point where the graph meets the x-axis" needs (5−1,0). Markschemes have given for an x-value on its own when a point was asked for; in Example 4.1, writing only x=5−1 would be that mistake.
More mistakes (8)
Rejecting a root just because it is negative
in Example 4.2, x=−4 is valid. What decides is the sign of each original argument and any domain the question states (in Example 4.1, x>1), never the sign of x on its own.
Removing the logs term by term
log4X−log4Y=1 does not give X−Y=4. Combine into one log first.
Losing the factor from a change of base
log8x=31log2x, so 6log8x=2log2x, not 6log2x and not log2x6. Then the power law comes before the quotient law: log2(3x)−2log2x=log2x23x, not log22x3x.
Removing the logs with a constant still outside
log2y=log2x2−3 does not give y=x2−3. Write 3=log28 and combine first: y=8x2 (Example 4.4).
Checking instead of showing
in Example 4.4(a), substituting y=8x2 back into log2y=2log2x−3 is a check, not a proof. Start from the given equation and end on x2=8y (the LHS-to-RHS layout).
Reading lnX=0 as X=0
it means X=e0=1.
The wrong base in the exponential form
log2X=3 means X=23, not 32 and not e3.
An unknown base of 1 or 0
log1 and log0 don't exist, so such a root is rejected when the unknown is a base.