Log laws
Combine, split, or use given log values
- In 6 of 20 recent exams
- Paper 1, no calculator
- 1 to 5 marks
How it is set in the exam
Paper 1 (no calculator) only, 1–5 marks per part: a short Section A question of its own, or the middle parts of a log question. Common (6 of 20 exam versions, 12 parts, all Paper 1 (no calculator)).
Exam phrases to spot (4)
“write as a single logarithm”
“express in the form lnk”
“given that ln2=a and ln7=b, express … in terms of a and b”
“show that loga2(…)=…”
In disguise (4)
- a long sum of logs whose terms cancel in pairs (a telescoping sum), written with "…" or in sigma notation (a ∑ sign alone does not make it Sigma notation: find the value, or find the unknown: no arithmetic or geometric formula applies)
- a "show that" linking two different bases
- "find the value of …" when the values of other logs are given: the given logs have to be used, so it is this type, not an evaluation
- "hence write f(x) in the form a+blogx": the rewrite is this type's move, but when the question then asks for the transformation it is Name the transformation
Variants (5)
- combine: a sum, a multiple, or minus the log of a fraction, each into lnk
- split and substitute: the log of a composite number, in letters for the logs of its primes; the same in another base, by change of base
- given log values: a log to a product base, logcdc, is given; it gives logcdd, then the logs of products, powers and roots of c and d
- show that: a log in base b2 (or b3) of a perfect square (or cube), as a log or a sum of logs in base b
- a telescoping sum to one log, then the same sum with n terms
Looks like it, but isn't (7)
- the logs of the terms of a sequence (lnx+lnx2+lnx3+⋯ is arithmetic in lnx): Logs of a sequence
- the unknown is inside a log or is its base: Solve a logarithmic equation, which uses these laws first
- a relation between two unknowns, shown from a log equation: the first part of Solve a logarithmic equation
- a constant k in a model: Exponential and log models
- one log of a number to evaluate, with no log values given and nothing to combine: Exact value of a logarithm
- "describe the transformations" after the rewrite: Name the transformation
- an exact area or integral in the form p+qlnr: Integrate: choose the method, Area between a curve and the x-axis or Area between two curves; only its last line uses these laws (Where exponents and logs hide)
Write as ln k: the fractional and negative traps
Express each as a single natural logarithm, lnk, with k∈Q.
(a) ln20−ln4 [1]
(b) 21ln81+ln2 [2]
(c) −2ln32 [2]
Try it yourself first, then compare.
Now try one like it
Write your working on paper or on screen. Paper Zero marks it step by step, like the worked example, and shows where each mark went. Free, with no account.
| The task | Move |
|---|---|
| Combine into one log | power law first (multipliers go inside as powers), then product and quotient; a constant becomes a log |
| Split and substitute | prime-factorise the argument; product, quotient and power laws; replace each log of a prime by its letter |
| Different bases | change of base to the base of the given logs (or to the prime), then the power law |
| Given the log of one factor to a product base (logcdc) | logcd(cd)=1 gives logcdd=1−logcdc; then split the target into logs of c and d |
| Telescoping | each term as the log of one fraction; the product law makes one log of a product; cancel; if nothing cancels at once, factorise each numerator and denominator first (k2−1=(k−1)(k+1)) |
- 1
Power law first:
multipliers become powers (to combine), or powers come down (to split). Roots are powers too.
- 2
Product and quotient laws:
combine into one log, or split into logs of primes.
- 3
Change of base
where the bases differ: rewrite in the base the question uses.
- 4
Finish:
work out the power (the final mark needs ln125, not ln53), or substitute the given letters or values.
- 5
"Show that":
start from one side, give each law its own line, and end on exactly the given form (the LHS-to-RHS layout, "show that" questions).
Multiplying the multiplier into the argument
21ln81 is not ln40.5. It is ln8121=ln9.
Splitting the log of a sum
ln(3+5)=ln3+ln5. Only ln(3×5) splits.
Leaving the power unworked
"ln53" for the form lnk loses the final mark; write ln125.
More mistakes (8)
A negative multiplier
−ln31=ln3, and −2ln32=ln49: the fraction flips.
Cancelling letters in a quotient of logs
a+b2a is the final form. And ln15ln9 is not ln159.
Change of base upside down
log159=ln15ln9: the argument goes on top, the base underneath. Check: 9<15, so log159<1, and a+b2a<1.
A "show that" with jumps
each law carries its own method mark, and the last mark is only for working that leads straight to the given result, so the given answer written after a jump loses that last mark, and a law that is never shown loses its method mark. Give each law its own visible line.
A bare answer when log values are given
a markscheme can cap it. In one 4-mark part that used given log values, a correct value with no working scored only the first and last marks (2 of 4). Show the split and the substitution.
Letters with no line before them
write the line in the logs of the primes (ln3+2ln5) before substituting a and b. That line has its own mark, so it still scores if the final expression goes wrong.
Treating a telescoping sum as a sequence
its terms are not in arithmetic or geometric sequence, so no Sn formula applies.
A term left as "1 plus or minus a fraction" in a telescoping sum
write each term as the log of one fraction first, e.g. log3(1+2k−12)=log32k−12k+1 (the terms of Example 2.3). That line has its own mark, and nothing cancels until it is done.